chr2-201272658-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_001400671.1(CASP8):c.-101A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000309 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
CASP8
NM_001400671.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
NM_001400671.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
2
17
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.108
Genes affected
CASP8 (HGNC:1509): (caspase 8) This gene encodes a member of the cysteine-aspartic acid protease (caspase) family. Sequential activation of caspases plays a central role in the execution-phase of cell apoptosis. Caspases exist as inactive proenzymes composed of a prodomain, a large protease subunit, and a small protease subunit. Activation of caspases requires proteolytic processing at conserved internal aspartic residues to generate a heterodimeric enzyme consisting of the large and small subunits. This protein is involved in the programmed cell death induced by Fas and various apoptotic stimuli. The N-terminal FADD-like death effector domain of this protein suggests that it may interact with Fas-interacting protein FADD. This protein was detected in the insoluble fraction of the affected brain region from Huntington disease patients but not in those from normal controls, which implicated the role in neurodegenerative diseases. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described, although not all variants have had their full-length sequences determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04482758).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000322 (471/1461850) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0142 (82/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0117. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 227 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASP8 | NM_001372051.1 | c.432A>G | p.Ile144Met | missense_variant | 4/9 | ENST00000673742.1 | NP_001358980.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASP8 | ENST00000673742.1 | c.432A>G | p.Ile144Met | missense_variant | 4/9 | NM_001372051.1 | ENSP00000501268.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000274 AC: 69AN: 251382Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000250 AC XY: 34AN XY: 135868
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
69
AN:
251382
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
135868
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000322 AC: 471AN: 1461850Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000312 AC XY: 227AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
471
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
227
AN XY:
727230
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
AC:
28
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 2B Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 05, 2022 | This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 176 of the CASP8 protein (p.Ile176Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs149933993, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CASP8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 333499). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CASP8 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Dec 16, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2023 | CASP8: PM2, BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Jan 16, 2019 | - - |
CASP8-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 21, 2022 | The CASP8 c.528A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ile176Met. This variant has been reported in a patient with primary immunodeficiency (described as p.Ile203Met, Table S2, Kelsen et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26193622). This variant is reported in 0.17% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-202137381-A-G). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;.;.;L;.;.;.;.;L;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;D;T;D;D;D;T;D;D;T;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;D;D;D;T;D;D;T;D;T
Polyphen
B;B;B;.;B;.;B;.;B;B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at