chr2-201621775-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001044385.3(TMEM237):c.*2480T>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00315 in 152,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
TMEM237
NM_001044385.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_001044385.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.82
Genes affected
TMEM237 (HGNC:14432): (transmembrane protein 237) The protein encoded by this gene is a tetraspanin protein that is thought to be involved in WNT signaling. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome-14. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 2-201621775-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-201621775-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 333540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00315 (479/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0105 (435/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00965. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 210 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM237 | NM_001044385.3 | c.*2480T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000409883.7 | ||
TMEM237 | NM_152388.4 | c.*2480T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM237 | ENST00000409883.7 | c.*2480T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | 5 | NM_001044385.3 | P4 | ||
ENO1P4 | ENST00000416471.2 | n.1656T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00314 AC: 478AN: 152172Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
478
AN:
152172
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 458Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 278
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
458
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
278
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00315 AC: 479AN: 152290Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00282 AC XY: 210AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
479
AN:
152290
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
210
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Joubert syndrome 14 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at