chr2-208121719-G-A

Position:

chr2-208121719-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 2P and 14B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_006891.4(CRYGD):c.479C>T(p.Thr160Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,613,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CRYGD
NM_006891.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.29

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYGD (HGNC:2411): (crystallin gamma D) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRYGD links:

LOC100507443 (HGNC:):

LOC100507443 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain Gamma-crystallin D (size 172) in uniprot entity CRGD_HUMAN there are 22 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (85%) in NM_006891.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.024134874).

BP6

Variant 2-208121719-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-208121719-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 896706.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000246 (36/1461490) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000301 (26/86252). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000211. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 22 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 70. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 36 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYGD	NM_006891.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.479C>T	p.Thr160Met	missense_variant	3/3	ENST00000264376.5	NP_008822.2	P07320A0A140CTX7
LOC100507443	NR_038437.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.97+2494G>A		intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYGD	ENST00000264376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.479C>T	p.Thr160Met	missense_variant	3/3	1	NM_006891.4	ENSP00000264376.4		P07320

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000358

AC:

AN:

251116

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000442

AC XY:

AN XY:

135752

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000246

AC:

AN:

1461490

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000303

AC XY:

AN XY:

726976

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000301

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

ExAC

AF:

0.0000659

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 4 multiple types

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.063

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.44

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.29

DANN

Benign

0.70

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.092

Eigen

Benign

-1.6

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.6

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0047

M_CAP

Benign

0.0068

MetaRNN

Benign

0.024

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.97

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

0.95

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.62

Sift4G

Benign

0.28

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.066

MutPred

0.33

Gain of catalytic residue at T160 (P = 0.0634);

MVP

0.41

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

-4.2

Varity_R

0.062

gMVP

0.15

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over