chr2-208121854-C-T

Position:

chr2-208121854-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_006891.4(CRYGD):c.344G>A(p.Arg115His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000254 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CRYGD
NM_006891.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.36

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYGD (HGNC:2411): (crystallin gamma D) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRYGD links:

LOC100507443 (HGNC:):

LOC100507443 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain Gamma-crystallin D (size 172) in uniprot entity CRGD_HUMAN there are 22 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (85%) in NM_006891.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.25998175).

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYGD	NM_006891.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.344G>A	p.Arg115His	missense_variant	3/3	ENST00000264376.5	NP_008822.2	P07320A0A140CTX7
LOC100507443	NR_038437.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.97+2629C>T		intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYGD	ENST00000264376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.344G>A	p.Arg115His	missense_variant	3/3	1	NM_006891.4	ENSP00000264376.4		P07320

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000795

AC:

AN:

251460

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135914

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000246

AC:

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000261

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000288

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74324

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aculeiform cataract

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

May 06, 2020

This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with CRYGD-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs774950923, ExAC 0.01%). This sequence change replaces arginine with histidine at codon 115 of the CRYGD protein (p.Arg115His). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between arginine and histidine. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C25". The histidine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, suggesting that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. These predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.089

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.0037

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.52

Eigen

Benign

-0.33

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.30

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.13

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.26

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.60

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

REVEL

Uncertain

0.34

Sift

Benign

0.049

Sift4G

Benign

0.10

Polyphen

0.017

Vest4

0.11

MutPred

0.78

Loss of catalytic residue at R115 (P = 0.0846);

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.31

ClinPred

0.92

GERP RS

3.3

Varity_R

0.32

gMVP

0.33

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over