chr2-213350614-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_024532.5(SPAG16):c.731C>T(p.Thr244Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00002 in 1,601,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024532.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024532.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.731C>T | p.Thr244Ile | missense | Exon 7 of 16 | ENSP00000332592.5 | Q8N0X2-1 | ||
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 | c.731C>T | p.Thr244Ile | missense | Exon 7 of 10 | ENSP00000400847.1 | E7EWV3 | ||
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 | n.*732C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 9 of 18 | ENSP00000385496.2 | F8WB32 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000249 AC: 6AN: 240740 AF XY: 0.0000307 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000207 AC: 30AN: 1449060Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000236 AC XY: 17AN XY: 720726 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74258 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at