chr2-213375067-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_024532.5(SPAG16):c.890G>A(p.Arg297His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,610,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R297C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024532.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024532.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.890G>A | p.Arg297His | missense | Exon 9 of 16 | ENSP00000332592.5 | Q8N0X2-1 | ||
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 | c.890G>A | p.Arg297His | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000400847.1 | E7EWV3 | ||
| SPAG16 | TSL:1 | n.*891G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 11 of 18 | ENSP00000385496.2 | F8WB32 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000443 AC: 11AN: 248038 AF XY: 0.0000149 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000192 AC: 28AN: 1458110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 725360 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74278 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at