chr2-222221236-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_181458.4(PAX3):​c.944C>A​(p.Thr315Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0357 in 1,613,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,249 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 76 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.037 ( 1173 hom. )

Consequence

PAX3
NM_181458.4 missense

Scores

2
11
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60
Variant links:
Genes affected
PAX3 (HGNC:8617): (paired box 3) This gene is a member of the paired box (PAX) family of transcription factors. Members of the PAX family typically contain a paired box domain and a paired-type homeodomain. These genes play critical roles during fetal development. Mutations in paired box gene 3 are associated with Waardenburg syndrome, craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The translocation t(2;13)(q35;q14), which represents a fusion between PAX3 and the forkhead gene, is a frequent finding in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Alternative splicing results in transcripts encoding isoforms with different C-termini. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005897939).
BP6
Variant 2-222221236-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-222221236-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 218940.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-222221236-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0253 (3854/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0402 (2737/68002). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.039. There are 76 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1834 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 76 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PAX3NM_181458.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.944C>A p.Thr315Lys missense_variant 6/9 ENST00000392070.7 NP_852123.1
LOC107985991XR_001739903.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.547G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PAX3ENST00000392070.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.944C>A p.Thr315Lys missense_variant 6/91 NM_181458.4 ENSP00000375922 A1P23760-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0253
AC:
3855
AN:
152124
Hom.:
76
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00654
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0403
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0202
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0268
AC:
6723
AN:
251172
Hom.:
121
AF XY:
0.0271
AC XY:
3680
AN XY:
135740
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0381
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0274
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0367
AC:
53689
AN:
1461608
Hom.:
1173
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0365
AC XY:
26518
AN XY:
727126
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0381
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0317
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0253
AC:
3854
AN:
152242
Hom.:
76
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0246
AC XY:
1834
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00652
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0402
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0199
Alfa
AF:
0.0361
Hom.:
174
Bravo
AF:
0.0231
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0383
AC:
142
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0402
AC:
155
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00817
AC:
36
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0379
AC:
326
ExAC
AF:
0.0266
AC:
3235
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00520
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0403
EpiControl
AF:
0.0334

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 24, 2014Thr314Lys in exon 6 of PAX3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it has been identified in 3.8% (326/8600) of European American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2234675). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 08, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 22, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 20, 2018- -
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of MedicineMar 03, 2015It is unclear whether these changes, alone or in aggregate, are contributing to the development of CDH in this family. -
Craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Waardenburg syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLaboratory of Human Genetics, Universidade de São PauloMar 01, 2017- -
Waardenburg syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.60
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.040
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.60
.;.;.;.;.;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.52
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.64
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0059
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.072
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;L;L;L;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;N;N;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.84, 0.76, 0.62
.;.;P;P;.;P
Vest4
0.27
MPC
0.79
ClinPred
0.031
T
GERP RS
6.1
Varity_R
0.30
gMVP
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2234675; hg19: chr2-223085955; COSMIC: COSV100399889; API