chr2-232526227-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000751.3(CHRND):āc.12A>Gā(p.Pro4=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.49 in 1,587,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 189,261 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.46 ( 16495 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.49 ( 172766 hom. )
Consequence
CHRND
NM_000751.3 synonymous
NM_000751.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.34
Genes affected
CHRND (HGNC:1965): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic delta subunit) The acetylcholine receptor of muscle has 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha and 1 each of beta, gamma and delta subunits. After acetylcholine binding, the receptor undergoes an extensive conformation change that affects all subunits and leads to opening of an ion-conducting channel across the plasma membrane. Defects in this gene are a cause of multiple pterygium syndrome lethal type (MUPSL), congenital myasthenic syndrome slow-channel type (SCCMS), and congenital myasthenic syndrome fast-channel type (FCCMS). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 2-232526227-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232526227-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128757.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-232526227-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.34 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.668 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRND | NM_000751.3 | c.12A>G | p.Pro4= | synonymous_variant | 1/12 | ENST00000258385.8 | NP_000742.1 | |
CHRND | NM_001256657.2 | c.12A>G | p.Pro4= | synonymous_variant | 1/11 | NP_001243586.1 | ||
CHRND | NM_001311195.2 | c.-260A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/10 | NP_001298124.1 | |||
CHRND | NM_001311196.2 | c.-260A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/12 | NP_001298125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRND | ENST00000258385.8 | c.12A>G | p.Pro4= | synonymous_variant | 1/12 | 1 | NM_000751.3 | ENSP00000258385 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.465 AC: 69913AN: 150440Hom.: 16475 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
69913
AN:
150440
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.504 AC: 125831AN: 249842Hom.: 32418 AF XY: 0.502 AC XY: 67874AN XY: 135186
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
125831
AN:
249842
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
67874
AN XY:
135186
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.492 AC: 707422AN: 1437272Hom.: 172766 Cov.: 50 AF XY: 0.493 AC XY: 352450AN XY: 714824
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
707422
AN:
1437272
Hom.:
Cov.:
50
AF XY:
AC XY:
352450
AN XY:
714824
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.465 AC: 69978AN: 150558Hom.: 16495 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.468 AC XY: 34424AN XY: 73528
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
69978
AN:
150558
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
34424
AN XY:
73528
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1992
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 19, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 09, 2015 | - - |
Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at