chr2-232526593-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000751.3(CHRND):​c.117C>G​(p.Asn39Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00349 in 1,613,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 59 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0034 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 54 hom. )

Consequence

CHRND
NM_000751.3 missense

Scores

8
10

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRND (HGNC:1965): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic delta subunit) The acetylcholine receptor of muscle has 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha and 1 each of beta, gamma and delta subunits. After acetylcholine binding, the receptor undergoes an extensive conformation change that affects all subunits and leads to opening of an ion-conducting channel across the plasma membrane. Defects in this gene are a cause of multiple pterygium syndrome lethal type (MUPSL), congenital myasthenic syndrome slow-channel type (SCCMS), and congenital myasthenic syndrome fast-channel type (FCCMS). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a topological_domain Extracellular (size 223) in uniprot entity ACHD_HUMAN there are 10 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (83%) in NM_000751.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009984076).
BP6
Variant 2-232526593-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232526593-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 195100.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-232526593-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00345 (525/152312) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0261 (135/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0225. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 280 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHRNDNM_000751.3 linkc.117C>G p.Asn39Lys missense_variant Exon 2 of 12 ENST00000258385.8 NP_000742.1 Q07001-1
CHRNDNM_001256657.2 linkc.117C>G p.Asn39Lys missense_variant Exon 2 of 11 NP_001243586.1 Q07001-2
CHRNDNM_001311196.2 linkc.-155C>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 12 NP_001298125.1 Q07001
CHRNDNM_001311195.2 linkc.-155C>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 10 NP_001298124.1 Q07001B4E3W4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHRNDENST00000258385.8 linkc.117C>G p.Asn39Lys missense_variant Exon 2 of 12 1 NM_000751.3 ENSP00000258385.3 Q07001-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00344
AC:
524
AN:
152194
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000820
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00589
AC:
1480
AN:
251246
Hom.:
16
AF XY:
0.00531
AC XY:
722
AN XY:
135884
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000739
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00359
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00349
AC:
5103
AN:
1461512
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00347
AC XY:
2524
AN XY:
727074
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000448
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00362
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00351
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00345
AC:
525
AN:
152312
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00376
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000818
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00519
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00378
Alfa
AF:
0.00306
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00451
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00351
AC:
13
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
12
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00140
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.00535
AC:
649
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0120
AC:
42
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00224
EpiControl
AF:
0.00225

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 31, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Jun 04, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 01, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29258548) -

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.41
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.57
.;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.38
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
.;M;M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.0
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Benign
0.034
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.021
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.0050
.;.;B
Vest4
0.35, 0.35
MutPred
0.60
Gain of methylation at N39 (P = 0.0101);Gain of methylation at N39 (P = 0.0101);Gain of methylation at N39 (P = 0.0101);
MVP
0.89
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.043
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.35
gMVP
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77084550; hg19: chr2-233391303; API