chr2-233270016-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_030803.7(ATG16L1):c.656G>T(p.Arg219Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000698 in 1,575,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R219Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030803.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030803.7. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATG16L1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.656G>T | p.Arg219Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 18 | ENSP00000375872.4 | Q676U5-1 | ||
| ATG16L1 | TSL:1 | c.656G>T | p.Arg219Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 17 | ENSP00000375875.4 | Q676U5-2 | ||
| ATG16L1 | TSL:1 | c.224G>T | p.Arg75Leu | missense | Exon 3 of 14 | ENSP00000318259.6 | Q676U5-5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000661 AC: 1AN: 151332Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000226 AC: 5AN: 221458 AF XY: 0.0000166 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000702 AC: 10AN: 1423698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000424 AC XY: 3AN XY: 707932 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000661 AC: 1AN: 151332Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 73848 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at