chr2-237575102-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_022449.4(RAB17):c.556G>A(p.Glu186Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,304 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022449.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022449.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAB17 | NM_022449.4 | MANE Select | c.556G>A | p.Glu186Lys | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | NP_071894.1 | Q9H0T7-1 | |
| RAB17 | NR_033308.2 | n.675G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAB17 | ENST00000264601.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.556G>A | p.Glu186Lys | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000264601.3 | Q9H0T7-1 | |
| RAB17 | ENST00000392001.6 | TSL:1 | n.*245G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000375858.2 | F8WAG1 | ||
| RAB17 | ENST00000477149.5 | TSL:1 | n.2435G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726962 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at