chr2-26464893-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.4936C>T(p.Pro1646Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0343 in 1,600,522 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,235 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 4306 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 3929 hom. )
Consequence
OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense
NM_194248.3 missense
Scores
1
4
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.62
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0014489889).
BP6
Variant 2-26464893-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26464893-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 21856.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-26464893-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.445 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | NM_194248.3 | c.4936C>T | p.Pro1646Ser | missense_variant | 39/47 | ENST00000272371.7 | NP_919224.1 | |
OTOF | NM_194323.3 | c.2635C>T | p.Pro879Ser | missense_variant | 22/29 | ENST00000339598.8 | NP_919304.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.4936C>T | p.Pro1646Ser | missense_variant | 39/47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371.2 | ||
OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.2635C>T | p.Pro879Ser | missense_variant | 22/29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.138 AC: 20919AN: 151994Hom.: 4284 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20919
AN:
151994
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0437 AC: 10621AN: 243164Hom.: 1661 AF XY: 0.0363 AC XY: 4778AN XY: 131564
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
10621
AN:
243164
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4778
AN XY:
131564
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0234 AC: 33854AN: 1448410Hom.: 3929 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0225 AC XY: 16163AN XY: 719826
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
33854
AN:
1448410
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
16163
AN XY:
719826
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.138 AC: 20988AN: 152112Hom.: 4306 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.134 AC XY: 9959AN XY: 74360
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20988
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
9959
AN XY:
74360
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
47
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
31
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1949
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
110
ExAC
AF:
AC:
6601
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 21, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 19, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 23, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;.;M;M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;.;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
B;B;.;B;.;B
Vest4
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at