chr2-26467435-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.4157C>G(p.Thr1386Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1386I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_194248.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
 - hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTOF | ENST00000272371.7  | c.4157C>G | p.Thr1386Ser | missense_variant | Exon 34 of 47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371.2 | ||
| OTOF | ENST00000339598.8  | c.1856C>G | p.Thr619Ser | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521.3 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  Cov.: 32 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.00000398  AC: 1AN: 251384 AF XY:  0.00   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.00000342  AC: 5AN: 1461822Hom.:  0  Cov.: 35 AF XY:  0.00000275  AC XY: 2AN XY: 727206 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  Cov.: 32 
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at