chr2-27086791-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006488.3(KHK):c.-469A>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.521 in 152,656 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,537 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.52 ( 22447 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.56 ( 90 hom. )
Consequence
KHK
NM_006488.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_006488.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0440
Genes affected
KHK (HGNC:6315): (ketohexokinase) This gene encodes ketohexokinase that catalyzes conversion of fructose to fructose-1-phosphate. The product of this gene is the first enzyme with a specialized pathway that catabolizes dietary fructose. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 2-27086791-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-27086791-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 335473.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.757 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KHK | NM_006488.3 | c.-469A>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | ENST00000260598.10 | NP_006479.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KHK | ENST00000260598.10 | c.-469A>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 2 | NM_006488.3 | ENSP00000260598 | P3 | ||
KHK | ENST00000260599.11 | c.-469A>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 1 | ENSP00000260599 | A1 | |||
KHK | ENST00000490823.5 | n.8A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/10 | 5 | |||||
KHK | ENST00000429697.2 | upstream_gene_variant | 5 | ENSP00000404741 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.521 AC: 79186AN: 152012Hom.: 22445 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
79186
AN:
152012
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.563 AC: 297AN: 528Hom.: 90 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.603 AC XY: 188AN XY: 312
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
297
AN:
528
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
312
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.521 AC: 79194AN: 152128Hom.: 22447 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.525 AC XY: 39065AN XY: 74386
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
79194
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
39065
AN XY:
74386
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2329
AN:
3466
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Essential fructosuria Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at