chr2-29193706-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):​c.4381A>G​(p.Ile1461Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.998 in 1,611,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 803,064 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1461L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.99 ( 74833 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 ( 728231 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:17O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.984

Publications

64 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
CLIP4 (HGNC:26108): (CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein family member 4) Predicted to enable microtubule plus-end binding activity. Predicted to be involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization. Located in intracellular membrane-bounded organelle. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=7.2734883E-7).
BP6
Variant 2-29193706-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29193706-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 133472.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004304.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ALK
NM_004304.5
MANE Select
c.4381A>Gp.Ile1461Val
missense
Exon 29 of 29NP_004295.2
ALK
NM_001353765.2
c.1177A>Gp.Ile393Val
missense
Exon 10 of 10NP_001340694.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ALK
ENST00000389048.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.4381A>Gp.Ile1461Val
missense
Exon 29 of 29ENSP00000373700.3
ALK
ENST00000638605.1
TSL:1
n.1258A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 11 of 11
ALK
ENST00000618119.4
TSL:5
c.3250A>Gp.Ile1084Val
missense
Exon 28 of 28ENSP00000482733.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.991
AC:
150841
AN:
152166
Hom.:
74774
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.969
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.998
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.996
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.994
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.998
AC:
249995
AN:
250608
AF XY:
0.998
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.969
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.999
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.996
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.999
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.999
AC:
1457866
AN:
1459326
Hom.:
728231
Cov.:
75
AF XY:
0.999
AC XY:
724917
AN XY:
725568
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.967
AC:
32271
AN:
33360
American (AMR)
AF:
0.999
AC:
44517
AN:
44560
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.996
AC:
25946
AN:
26046
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
39656
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
86192
AN:
86192
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
53366
AN:
53366
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.998
AC:
5752
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
1109984
AN:
1110102
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.998
AC:
60182
AN:
60280
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
97
194
292
389
486
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21670
43340
65010
86680
108350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.991
AC:
150959
AN:
152284
Hom.:
74833
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.992
AC XY:
73842
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.970
AC:
40297
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.998
AC:
15277
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.996
AC:
3458
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5162
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
4816
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
10614
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
1.00
AC:
294
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
68028
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.994
AC:
2101
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
65
130
194
259
324
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
914
1828
2742
3656
4570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.996
Hom.:
185042
Bravo
AF:
0.990
TwinsUK
AF:
1.00
AC:
3707
ALSPAC
AF:
1.00
AC:
3854
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.972
AC:
4283
ESP6500EA
AF:
1.00
AC:
8597
ExAC
AF:
0.997
AC:
121066
Asia WGS
AF:
1.00
AC:
3476
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
1.00
EpiControl
AF:
1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:9
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 15, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 19, 2024
Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 17, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 10, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Mar 02, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Apr 27, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.4381A>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Ile to Val. 4/4 in-silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant is found in 120930/121274 control chromosomes (60296 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.9971634, which is about 2393192 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000004), suggesting the variant to be the ancestral allele; therefore it is classified as Benign.

Squamous cell lung carcinoma Pathogenic:1
May 05, 2020
Faculté Pluridciplinaire Nador, Université Mohamed Premier
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing;in vivo

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
0.0090
DANN
Benign
0.53
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.010
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0048
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.086
T
MetaRNN
Benign
7.3e-7
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.1
N
PhyloP100
-0.98
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.37
N
REVEL
Benign
0.021
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.0040
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.0021
T
GERP RS
-0.13
Varity_R
0.017
gMVP
0.075
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1670283; hg19: chr2-29416572; COSMIC: COSV101201052; COSMIC: COSV101201052; API