chr2-47410300-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.573C>T(p.Leu191Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00343 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 180 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 88 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 92 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous
NM_000251.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.27
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 2-47410300-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47410300-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 91140.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47410300-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.27 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0618 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.573C>T | p.Leu191Leu | synonymous_variant | 3/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.573C>T | p.Leu191Leu | synonymous_variant | 3/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0181 AC: 2757AN: 152062Hom.: 87 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2757
AN:
152062
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00475 AC: 1195AN: 251458Hom.: 35 AF XY: 0.00353 AC XY: 480AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1195
AN:
251458
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
480
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00190 AC: 2783AN: 1461876Hom.: 92 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00161 AC XY: 1171AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2783
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1171
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0181 AC: 2761AN: 152180Hom.: 88 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0177 AC XY: 1316AN XY: 74398
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2761
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1316
AN XY:
74398
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH2 p.Leu191= variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs1800151) “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign, reviewed by an expert panel (2013); submitters benign by InSIGHT, Ambry Genetics, Prevention Genetics, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, ARUP, and Mayo Clinic, and likely benign by Illumina), Clinvitae (3x), Cosmic (in numerous primary tissue type tumours), UMD-LSDB (7x as neutral, co-occurring with pathogenic variants MSH2 c.1_211del (p.Met1?) and MSH6 c.2150_2153delTCAG (p.Val717AlafsX18)), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (3x class 1), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database (2x), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (4x), and in control databases in 1690 (48 homozygous) of 277178 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.006 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1576 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.07), Other in 12 of 6462 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 86 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European Non-Finnish in 12 of 126694 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 4 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), while not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European Finnish populations. The variant was not identified in GeneInSight-COGR, MutDB, OR Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The p.Leu191= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 31, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 23, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Apr 06, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jan 24, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 13, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 21, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 21, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jul 12, 2022 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | MAF >1% - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at