chr2-47429833-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1168C>T(p.Leu390Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00074 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00055 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 15 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
2
13
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.61
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011555076).
BP6
Variant 2-47429833-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47429833-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41641.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47429833-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000552 (84/152272) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0156 (81/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0129. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1168C>T | p.Leu390Phe | missense_variant | 7/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1168C>T | p.Leu390Phe | missense_variant | 7/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000559 AC: 85AN: 152154Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
85
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00155 AC: 389AN: 251454Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00146 AC XY: 199AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
389
AN:
251454
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000759 AC: 1110AN: 1461844Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000749 AC XY: 545AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1110
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
545
AN XY:
727230
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000552 AC: 84AN: 152272Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000631 AC XY: 47AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
84
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
201
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 04, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 2.1% in East Asian population with 2 homozygotes. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 19, 2022 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 20, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 09, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 31, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 11, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 21, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1168C>T variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Leu to Phe. 2/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant is found in 229/123604 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0018527. The frequency of this variant in East Asian control population is 0.0217, which is about 38 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0005683), suggesting this variant is benign. This variant has been reported in a large number of patients with LS or endometrial cancer. Two co-occurrences with a pathogenic variant (MLH1, c.2157dup, p.Val720Cysfs*3 and MSH2 c.196-187dupG, respectively) were reported, along with a reported lack of co-segregation with the disease (Okamura_1998). Multiple functional studies showed that MSH2 p.L390F has similar activity to wild-type MSH2. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jul 29, 2021 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH2 p.Leu390Phe variant was identified in 12 of 952 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.013) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Jin 2008, Lee 2005, Wei 2011, Yap 2009, Zhang 2006) and was present in 1 of 220 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Zhang 2006). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17224367) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by InSight, Emory Genetics, Ambry Genetics, Invitae; classified as likely benign by GeneDx, Illumina, LMMPHCPM; classified as uncertain significance by BLDSNIH), Clinvitae (classified as benign by ClinVar, Invitae, EmvClass; classified as uncertain significance by ClinVar), MutDB , UMD-LSDB (2X classified as neutral), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (44X classified as class 1), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (7X ), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, Insight Hereditary Tumors Database, databases. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic MLH1 variant (c.304G>A (p.Glu102Lys)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Leu390Phe variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 402(4 homozygous) of 277162 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00145 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Leu390 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS, core DNA mismatch repair protein, MSH2 functional domains, increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. Functional study of MSH2 on the corresponding yeast allele L402 demonstrated no reduction in steady-state levels of MSH2 and positive interaction with all MSH2 partners (Gammie 2007). The variant was also found co-occurring with pathogenic mutation MLH1 variant c.2157dupT (Wei 2011). However, study by Fan (2005) provides strong molecular epidemiologic, structural, bioinformatic, and functional evidence that MSH2 c.1168C>T (p.Leu390Phe) underlies a newly identified phenotype relevant to young sporadic CRC or GC. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
Polyphen
B;.;.;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at