chr2-47429833-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.1168C>T​(p.Leu390Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00074 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00055 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense

Scores

2
13
3

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.61
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011555076).
BP6
Variant 2-47429833-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47429833-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41641.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47429833-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000552 (84/152272) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0156 (81/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0129. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1168C>T p.Leu390Phe missense_variant 7/16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1168C>T p.Leu390Phe missense_variant 7/161 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000559
AC:
85
AN:
152154
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00155
AC:
389
AN:
251454
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000490
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000759
AC:
1110
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000749
AC XY:
545
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000546
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000552
AC:
84
AN:
152272
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000631
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000413
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000824
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00166
AC:
201
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00808
AC:
28
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 04, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 2.1% in East Asian population with 2 homozygotes. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 19, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 19, 2022- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 20, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 09, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 31, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 11, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 21, 2016Variant summary: The c.1168C>T variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Leu to Phe. 2/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant is found in 229/123604 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0018527. The frequency of this variant in East Asian control population is 0.0217, which is about 38 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0005683), suggesting this variant is benign. This variant has been reported in a large number of patients with LS or endometrial cancer. Two co-occurrences with a pathogenic variant (MLH1, c.2157dup, p.Val720Cysfs*3 and MSH2 c.196-187dupG, respectively) were reported, along with a reported lack of co-segregation with the disease (Okamura_1998). Multiple functional studies showed that MSH2 p.L390F has similar activity to wild-type MSH2. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 29, 2021- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MSH2 p.Leu390Phe variant was identified in 12 of 952 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.013) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Jin 2008, Lee 2005, Wei 2011, Yap 2009, Zhang 2006) and was present in 1 of 220 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Zhang 2006). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17224367) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by InSight, Emory Genetics, Ambry Genetics, Invitae; classified as likely benign by GeneDx, Illumina, LMMPHCPM; classified as uncertain significance by BLDSNIH), Clinvitae (classified as benign by ClinVar, Invitae, EmvClass; classified as uncertain significance by ClinVar), MutDB , UMD-LSDB (2X classified as neutral), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (44X classified as class 1), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (7X ), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, Insight Hereditary Tumors Database, databases. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic MLH1 variant (c.304G>A (p.Glu102Lys)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Leu390Phe variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 402(4 homozygous) of 277162 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00145 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Leu390 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS, core DNA mismatch repair protein, MSH2 functional domains, increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. Functional study of MSH2 on the corresponding yeast allele L402 demonstrated no reduction in steady-state levels of MSH2 and positive interaction with all MSH2 partners (Gammie 2007). The variant was also found co-occurring with pathogenic mutation MLH1 variant c.2157dupT (Wei 2011). However, study by Fan (2005) provides strong molecular epidemiologic, structural, bioinformatic, and functional evidence that MSH2 c.1168C>T (p.Leu390Phe) underlies a newly identified phenotype relevant to young sporadic CRC or GC. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.47
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.080
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.85
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.23
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.33
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.30
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.69
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;D;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Uncertain
0.011
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.037
D;D;.;D
Polyphen
0.15
B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.50
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.0094
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.66
gMVP
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17224367; hg19: chr2-47656972; COSMIC: COSV99253609; API