chr2-47470956-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.1662-9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00108 in 1,341,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0046 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00006028
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.975
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 2-47470956-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47470956-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 90730.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47470956-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0046 (700/152108) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0145 (603/41488). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0136. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 326 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkc.1662-9G>A intron_variant Intron 10 of 15 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkc.1662-9G>A intron_variant Intron 10 of 15 1 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00461
AC:
700
AN:
151990
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00958
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00133
AC:
332
AN:
249892
AF XY:
0.00110
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000634
AC:
754
AN:
1189634
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
17
AF XY:
0.000580
AC XY:
351
AN XY:
605536
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0168
AC:
473
AN:
28142
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00163
AC:
72
AN:
44254
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24418
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000523
AC:
2
AN:
38216
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000873
AC:
7
AN:
80182
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53118
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
108
AN:
865432
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
81
AN:
51132
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
32
63
95
126
158
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00460
AC:
700
AN:
152108
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00438
AC XY:
326
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0145
AC:
0.0145343
AN:
0.0145343
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00406
AC:
0.00405812
AN:
0.00405812
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
AC:
0.000207814
AN:
0.000207814
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
AC:
0.000205901
AN:
0.000205901
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00948
AC:
0.00947867
AN:
0.00947867
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
34
67
101
134
168
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00144
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00544
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00145
AC:
5
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:18
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
-
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 28, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 17, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Sep 07, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Dec 10, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. This variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease. -

Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 02, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 18, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MSH2 c.1662-9G>A variant was identified in 3 of 584 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Montera 2000, Farrington 1998, Thompson 2013). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17218356) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by an InSiGHT expert panel (2013) and five other submitters; as likely benign by 2 submitters; and as uncertain significance by 2 submitters). The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB. The variant was also identified in control databases in 465 (4 homozygous) of 276212 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 386 (4 homozygous) of 23980 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Other in 14 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 38 of 34372 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 22 of 126108 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), East Asian in 2 of 18846 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 3 of 30556 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), while it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or European Finnish populations. The c.1662-9G>A variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions, although positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. Furthermore, in vitro splicing analysis performed by Thompson (2013) determined the splicing of this allele to be similar to wild type. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Nov 09, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.59
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000060
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.010
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17218356; hg19: chr2-47698095; API