chr2-47471062-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1759G>C(p.Gly587Arg) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 15/25 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G587S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1759G>C | p.Gly587Arg | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 11/16 | ENST00000233146.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1759G>C | p.Gly587Arg | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 11/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 20
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Aug 03, 2023 | This variant is considered pathogenic. mRNA analysis has demonstrated abnormal mRNA splicing occurs [PMID: 18561205]. - |
Lynch syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Variant causes splicing aberration (full inactivation of variant allele) - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 10, 2023 | This sequence change affects codon 587 of the MSH2 mRNA. It is a 'silent' change, meaning that it does not change the encoded amino acid sequence of the MSH2 protein. This variant also falls at the last nucleotide of exon 11, which is part of the consensus splice site for this exon. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 20587412, 21642682, 22067334, 27601186). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 90771). Based on a multifactorial likelihood algorithm using genetic, in silico, and/or statistical data, this variant has been determined to have a high probability of being pathogenic (PMID: 24362816). Experimental studies have shown that this variant does not substantially affect MSH2 function (PMID: 33357406). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that this variant alters mRNA splicing and is expected to lead to the loss of protein expression (PMID: 18561205; Invitae). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 15, 2018 | The c.1759G>C pathogenic mutation (also known as p.G587R), located in coding exon 11 of the MSH2 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 1759. The amino acid change results in glycine to arginine at codon 587, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. However, this change occurs in the last base pair of coding exon 11, which makes it likely to have some effect on normal mRNA splicing. This alteration has been reported in multiple Lynch syndrome families (Sjursen W et al. J. Med. Genet., 2010 Sep;47:579-85; Bonadona V et al. JAMA, 2011 Jun;305:2304-10; Hagen CE et al. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2011 Dec;35:1902-5; Hansen MF et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2014 Mar;2:186-200). Hagen et al. reported this alteration in an individual's colon tumor which showed absent MLH1/MSH2 protein expression and was positive for MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. The proband met Amsterdam II criteria and the c.1759G>C alteration was subsequently identified in the proband's germline. Sjursen et al. reported this alteration in an individual with colon cancer diagnosed under age 50 which showed absent MSH2 protein expression; further RT-PCR patient RNA studies demonstrated out-of-frame skipping of exon 11, resulting in a frameshift and premature truncation. Tournier et al. performed splicing analyses using a pCAS mini-gene in HeLa cells and also demonstrated exon 11 skipping (Tournier I et al. Hum. Mutat., 2008 Dec;29:1412-24). In addition, this mutation was identified as somatic in an individual with MSH2 absent colorectal cancer (Yuen ST et al. Oncogene 2002 Oct;21:7585-92). This alteration has been classified as pathogenic using the following lines of evidence: in silico prediction models, segregation with disease, clinical phenotype including tumor characteristics, mutation co-occurrence, and functional studies (Thompson BA et al. Hum. Mutat. 2013 Jan;34:200-9; Thompson BA et al. Nat. Genet. 2014 Feb;46:107-15; available at [www.insight-group.org/variants/classifications/]). This amino acid position is highly conserved on species alignment. Using two different splice site prediction tools, this alteration is predicted by ESEfinder to abolish the native splice donor site, but is predicted to weaken (but not abolish) the efficiency of the native splice donor site by BDGP; however, direct evidence is unavailable. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by MAPP-MMR in silico analyses (Chao EC et al. Hum. Mutat. 2008 Jun;29:852-60). Based on the supporting evidence, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at