chr2-47806652-G-GTAAC
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PVS1_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.4001+12_4001+15dup variant causes a splice donor change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000347 in 1,607,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
MSH6
NM_000179.3 splice_donor
NM_000179.3 splice_donor
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0550
Genes affected
MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
FBXO11 (HGNC:13590): (F-box protein 11) This gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family which is characterized by an approximately 40 amino acid motif, the F-box. The F-box proteins constitute one of the four subunits of ubiquitin protein ligase complex called SCFs (SKP1-cullin-F-box), which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination. The F-box proteins are divided into 3 classes: Fbws containing WD-40 domains, Fbls containing leucine-rich repeats, and Fbxs containing either different protein-protein interaction modules or no recognizable motifs. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Fbxs class. It can function as an arginine methyltransferase that symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues, and it acts as an adaptor protein to mediate the neddylation of p53, which leads to the suppression of p53 function. This gene is known to be down-regulated in melanocytes from patients with vitiligo, a skin disorder that results in depigmentation. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media (COME/ROM), a hearing loss disorder, and the knockout of the homologous mouse gene results in the deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf), a single gene model of otitis media. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
PVS1
Splicing +-2 bp (donor or acceptor) variant, product NOT destroyed by NMD, known LOF gene, truncates exone, which is 0.048738673 fraction of the gene. Cryptic splice site detected, with MaxEntScore 6.2, offset of 0 (no position change), new splice context is: tcgGTaact. Cryptic site results in inframe change. If cryptic site found is not functional and variant results in exon loss, it results in frameshift change.
BP6
Variant 2-47806652-G-GTAAC is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47806652-G-GTAAC is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 182672.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000408 (62/151998) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000869 (36/41440). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000645. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.4001+12_4001+15dup | splice_donor_variant | ENST00000234420.11 | NP_000170.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.4001+12_4001+15dup | splice_donor_variant | 1 | NM_000179.3 | ENSP00000234420 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000408 AC: 62AN: 151882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
151882
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000262 AC: 64AN: 244224Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000257 AC XY: 34AN XY: 132416
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
64
AN:
244224
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
132416
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000340 AC: 495AN: 1455196Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000331 AC XY: 240AN XY: 724204
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
495
AN:
1455196
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
240
AN XY:
724204
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000408 AC: 62AN: 151998Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000350 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74306
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
151998
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74306
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 07, 2018 | Variant summary: MSH6 c.4001+12_4001+15dupACTA alters a nucleotide located in the intronic region that is not widely known to affect splicing. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 270198 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 2 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH6 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00014), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.4001+12_4001+15dupACTA in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 29, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Nov 22, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 21, 2013 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 07, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Endometrial carcinoma;C1833477:Lynch syndrome 5;C5436807:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 26, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 19, 2023 | - - |
MSH6-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 08, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 11, 2021 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH6 c.4001+12_4001+15dupACTA variant was identified in 1 of 1500 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00066) from individuals or families with CRC and was identified as non-pathogenic variant (Woods 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs587782538) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (4x, as benign by GeneDx, as likely benign by Ambry, Invitae and Counsyl), Clinvitae (3x, as likely benign), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (3x, as Class 3), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (3x), databases. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 75 of 270198 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00028 in the following populations: African in 17 of 23654 chromosomes (freq. 0.0007), Latino in 13 of 34140 chromosomes (freq. 0.00038), European in 35 of 123578 chromosomes (freq. 0.00028), East Asian in 5 of 1860 chromosomes (freq. 0.00026), and other in 1 of 6346 chromosomes (freq. 0.00015), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10042 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001), South Asian in 3 of 30528 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001), increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. A co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.709G>T, p.Glu237X) is identified in 1 individual with breast cancer in our laboratory, increasing the likelihood that c.4001+12_4001+15dupACTA variant does not have clinical significance In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at