chr2-50497679-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP3BP4BS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.2533C>T(p.His845Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001 in 1,613,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 missense
NM_001330078.2 missense
Scores
8
7
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.76
Genes affected
NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3581644).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000611 (93/152222) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00115 (78/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000941. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 32 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | NM_001330078.2 | c.2533C>T | p.His845Tyr | missense_variant | 14/23 | ENST00000401669.7 | NP_001317007.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | ENST00000401669.7 | c.2533C>T | p.His845Tyr | missense_variant | 14/23 | 5 | NM_001330078.2 | ENSP00000385017 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000611 AC: 93AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
93
AN:
152104
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000507 AC: 126AN: 248370Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000542 AC XY: 73AN XY: 134694
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
126
AN:
248370
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
134694
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00104 AC: 1527AN: 1461336Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 735AN XY: 726904
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1527
AN:
1461336
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
735
AN XY:
726904
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000611 AC: 93AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000430 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74438
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
93
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
74438
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
AC:
72
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:13Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:6
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 14, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 23, 2024 | Reported in a patient with autism spectrum disorder, sibling with learning disabilities and their unaffected father, and in an unrelated individual with spastic paraplegia and epilepsy who was also a compound heterozygote for 2 variants in the ALDH18A1 gene (PMID: 23849776, 29754261); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Missense variant in a gene in which most reported pathogenic variants are truncating/loss-of-function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29754261, 34168285, 23849776) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 04, 2021 | - - |
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jun 11, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jun 28, 2018 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2;C3808494:Chromosome 2p16.3 deletion syndrome Uncertain:2Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect-Association for Creatine Deficiencies, Association for Creatine Deficiencies | - | Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 07-13-2019 by lab or GTR ID 26957. GenomeConnect - Association for Creatine Deficiencies assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | NRXN1 NM_001135659.2 exon 15 p.His885Tyr (c.2653C>T): This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 1 individual with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), segregating with disease in 1 affected family member. However, this family member did not meet clinical criteria for ASD (Jiang 2013 PMID:23849776). This variant is present in 0.1% (78/68024) of European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-50497679-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:20245). Evolutionary conservation suggests that this variant may impact the protein; computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 22, 2015 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 20, 2021 | The c.2653C>T (p.H885Y) alteration is located in exon 15 (coding exon 14) of the NRXN1 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2653, causing the histidine (H) at amino acid position 885 to be replaced by a tyrosine (Y). The alteration is ultra rare in population databases:_x000D_ The NRXN1 c.2653C>T alteration was observed in 72 out of 120,252 total alleles studied (0.06%) in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database, with a frequency of 69/66,496 (0.1%) in the European (Non-Finnish) sub-population. Based on data from the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), the NRXN1 c.2653C>T alteration was observed in 12 among 12,074 total alleles studied (0.1%). Allele frequency data for this nucleotide position are not currently available from the 1000 Genomes Project. Rare missense alleles commonly exhibit a deleterious effect on protein function (Kryukov, 2007; Tennessen, 2012; please note that some variants may appear to be rare due to ethnic underrepresentation in the database)._x000D_ IF USED, PULL THESE INTO REFERENCES:_x000D_ Kryukov GV, et al. (2007) Am J Hum Genet 80:727-739. Tennessen JA, et al. (2012) Science 337(64):64-69. The alteration has been observed in affected individuals: _x000D_ The NRXN1 c.2653C>T (p.H885Y) alteration has been reported in a proband with autism spectrum disorder and his brother with a learning disability. The alteration was found to be inherited from the brothers' unaffected father (Jiang, 2013). The altered amino acid is conserved throughout evolution:_x000D_ The p.H885 amino acid is conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico prediction is conflicting:_x000D_ The p.H885Y alteration is predicted to be probably damaging by Polyphen and tolerated by SIFT in silico analyses. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;D;D;D;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Benign
.;T;T;T;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.65
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at