chr2-61825245-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001201543.2(FAM161A):c.*1210T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.388 in 444,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35,466 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001201543.2 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- retinitis pigmentosa 28Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.382 AC: 58060AN: 151896Hom.: 11671 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.421 AC: 51797AN: 123000 AF XY: 0.414 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.391 AC: 114327AN: 292614Hom.: 23765 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.393 AC XY: 65421AN XY: 166506 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.382 AC: 58132AN: 152014Hom.: 11701 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.393 AC XY: 29206AN XY: 74310 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at