chr2-61825245-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001201543.2(FAM161A):​c.*1210T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.388 in 444,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35,466 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.38 ( 11701 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.39 ( 23765 hom. )

Consequence

FAM161A
NM_001201543.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.41

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAM161A (HGNC:25808): (FAM161 centrosomal protein A) This gene belongs to the FAM161 family. It is expressed mainly in the retina. Mouse studies suggested that this gene is involved in development of retinal progenitors during embryogenesis, and that its activity is restricted to mature photoreceptors after birth. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa-28. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
FAM161A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinitis pigmentosa 28
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 2-61825245-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-61825245-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 336715.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.664 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAM161ANM_001201543.2 linkc.*1210T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000404929.6 NP_001188472.1 Q3B820-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAM161AENST00000404929.6 linkc.*1210T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_001201543.2 ENSP00000385158.1 Q3B820-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.382
AC:
58060
AN:
151896
Hom.:
11671
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.363
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.242
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.497
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.261
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.683
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.478
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.444
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.218
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.421
AC:
51797
AN:
123000
AF XY:
0.414
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.360
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.541
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.260
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.683
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.418
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.335
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.373
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.391
AC:
114327
AN:
292614
Hom.:
23765
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.393
AC XY:
65421
AN XY:
166506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.359
AC:
2900
AN:
8068
American (AMR)
AF:
0.540
AC:
13708
AN:
25368
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.259
AC:
2706
AN:
10432
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.679
AC:
6291
AN:
9268
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.445
AC:
24843
AN:
55886
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.416
AC:
5093
AN:
12250
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.221
AC:
249
AN:
1126
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.341
AC:
53436
AN:
156568
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.374
AC:
5101
AN:
13648
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3711
7422
11132
14843
18554
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
428
856
1284
1712
2140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.382
AC:
58132
AN:
152014
Hom.:
11701
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.393
AC XY:
29206
AN XY:
74310
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.362
AC:
15036
AN:
41482
American (AMR)
AF:
0.497
AC:
7598
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.261
AC:
906
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.683
AC:
3533
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.478
AC:
2297
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.444
AC:
4672
AN:
10518
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.231
AC:
68
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.338
AC:
22982
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.389
AC:
820
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1779
3558
5338
7117
8896
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
568
1136
1704
2272
2840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.346
Hom.:
8348
Bravo
AF:
0.385
Asia WGS
AF:
0.586
AC:
2028
AN:
3464

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
1.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3736598; hg19: chr2-62052380; API