chr2-73385903-TGGAGGAGGA-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):βc.66_74delβ(p.Glu26_Glu28del) variant causes a inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0129 in 672,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (β β ).
Frequency
Genomes: π 0.0066 ( 10 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes π: 0.015 ( 38 hom. )
Consequence
ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 inframe_deletion
NM_001378454.1 inframe_deletion
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.45
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP3
Nonframeshift variant in repetitive region in NM_001378454.1
BP6
Variant 2-73385903-TGGAGGAGGA-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73385903-TGGAGGAGGA-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 403930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00658 (944/143536) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0114 (731/64316). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0107. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 415 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.66_74del | p.Glu26_Glu28del | inframe_deletion | 1/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.66_74del | p.Glu27_Glu29del | inframe_deletion | 1/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.66_74del | p.Glu26_Glu28del | inframe_deletion | 1/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00658 AC: 944AN: 143440Hom.: 10 Cov.: 0
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
944
AN:
143440
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0196 AC: 1632AN: 83366Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.0202 AC XY: 880AN XY: 43654
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1632
AN:
83366
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
880
AN XY:
43654
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0146 AC: 7739AN: 528632Hom.: 38 AF XY: 0.0145 AC XY: 4082AN XY: 282412
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7739
AN:
528632
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4082
AN XY:
282412
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00658 AC: 944AN: 143536Hom.: 10 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00596 AC XY: 415AN XY: 69596
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
944
AN:
143536
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
415
AN XY:
69596
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 27, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 15, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 27, 2017 | - - |
Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at