chr2-73448398-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.1871A>G​(p.His624Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0206 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 423 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.021 ( 399 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.281
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00374794).
BP6
Variant 2-73448398-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73448398-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 240984.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-73448398-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0158 (2412/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0261 (1774/67984). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0251. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1163 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.1871A>G p.His624Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.1871A>G p.His624Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 NP_055935.4 Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.1871A>G p.His624Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1 Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0159
AC:
2413
AN:
152138
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00420
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0153
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0169
AC:
4208
AN:
249146
Hom.:
49
AF XY:
0.0164
AC XY:
2220
AN XY:
135160
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00898
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00656
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0175
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0211
AC:
30821
AN:
1461770
Hom.:
399
Cov.:
58
AF XY:
0.0204
AC XY:
14849
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00305
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00997
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00758
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00328
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0191
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0158
AC:
2412
AN:
152256
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0156
AC XY:
1163
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0147
Alfa
AF:
0.0220
Hom.:
54
Bravo
AF:
0.0145
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0205
AC:
76
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0218
AC:
84
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00402
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0255
AC:
209
ExAC
AF:
0.0190
AC:
2291
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
May 18, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26104972) -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 29, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified Benign:3
Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.His623Arg in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 2.88% (1921/66716) of European chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs41291187). -

Apr 10, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The ALMS1 c.1868A>G (p.His623Arg, alternative name c.1874A>G) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 3/4 in silico tools (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index) predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 2291/120716 control chromosomes (31 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0189784, which is approximately 8 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ALMS1 variant (0.0022361), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as "benign." -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Jul 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Jan 25, 2019
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

ACMG criteria: BP4 (9 predictors, REVEL=0.012), BA1 (2.8% in EurNF in gnomAD), BS2 (31 homozygotes in ExAC, 54 homozygotes in gnomAD), BP1 (known variants are truncating)=benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 24, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.083
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
0.94
DANN
Benign
0.31
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.014
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.055
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.33
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0037
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.34
T;T;T
Vest4
0.029
ClinPred
0.00091
T
GERP RS
-2.5
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.055

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41291187; hg19: chr2-73675525; API