chr2-84441381-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_003849.4(SUCLG1):c.397A>T(p.Ile133Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000136 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003849.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 9Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003849.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUCLG1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.397A>T | p.Ile133Phe | missense | Exon 4 of 9 | ENSP00000377446.2 | P53597 | ||
| SUCLG1 | c.424A>T | p.Ile142Phe | missense | Exon 5 of 10 | ENSP00000619617.1 | ||||
| SUCLG1 | c.397A>T | p.Ile133Phe | missense | Exon 4 of 9 | ENSP00000582852.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000478 AC: 12AN: 251170 AF XY: 0.0000589 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152312Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at