chr2-86214180-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001371279.1(REEP1):c.*2859T>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.322 in 153,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,577 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 9441 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.43 ( 136 hom. )
Consequence
REEP1
NM_001371279.1 3_prime_UTR
NM_001371279.1 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.861
Genes affected
REEP1 (HGNC:25786): (receptor accessory protein 1) This gene encodes a mitochondrial protein that functions to enhance the cell surface expression of odorant receptors. Mutations in this gene cause spastic paraplegia autosomal dominant type 31, a neurodegenerative disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 2-86214180-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-86214180-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 337344.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.57 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REEP1 | NM_001371279.1 | c.*2859T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000538924.7 | NP_001358208.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REEP1 | ENST00000538924.7 | c.*2859T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 5 | NM_001371279.1 | ENSP00000438346 | |||
REEP1 | ENST00000165698.9 | c.*2920T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/7 | 1 | ENSP00000165698 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.321 AC: 48734AN: 152006Hom.: 9429 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
48734
AN:
152006
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.431 AC: 634AN: 1470Hom.: 136 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.432 AC XY: 374AN XY: 866
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
634
AN:
1470
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
374
AN XY:
866
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.320 AC: 48749AN: 152124Hom.: 9441 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.327 AC XY: 24343AN XY: 74372
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
48749
AN:
152124
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
24343
AN XY:
74372
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1655
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 29, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary spastic paraplegia 31 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at