chr2-88124547-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001443.3(FABP1):āc.280A>Gā(p.Thr94Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.305 in 1,609,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 78,312 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001443.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABP1 | NM_001443.3 | c.280A>G | p.Thr94Ala | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000295834.8 | NP_001434.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABP1 | ENST00000295834.8 | c.280A>G | p.Thr94Ala | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_001443.3 | ENSP00000295834.3 | ||
FABP1 | ENST00000393750.3 | c.280A>G | p.Thr94Ala | missense_variant | 3/3 | 2 | ENSP00000377351.3 | |||
FABP1 | ENST00000495375.1 | n.566A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.287 AC: 43552AN: 151928Hom.: 6991 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.303 AC: 75214AN: 248312Hom.: 12506 AF XY: 0.299 AC XY: 40183AN XY: 134296
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.307 AC: 446857AN: 1457694Hom.: 71317 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.304 AC XY: 220408AN XY: 725192
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.287 AC: 43584AN: 152048Hom.: 6995 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.290 AC XY: 21575AN XY: 74302
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at