chr20-2403658-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting
The NM_198994.3(TGM6):c.1171G>A(p.Val391Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000328 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V391L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198994.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spinocerebellar ataxia type 35Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGM6 | ENST00000202625.7 | c.1171G>A | p.Val391Met | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 13 | 1 | NM_198994.3 | ENSP00000202625.2 | ||
| TGM6 | ENST00000381423.1 | c.1171G>A | p.Val391Met | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 12 | 1 | ENSP00000370831.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.000375  AC: 57AN: 152172Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000815  AC: 205AN: 251454 AF XY:  0.000728   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000324  AC: 473AN: 1461872Hom.:  8  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.000309  AC XY: 225AN XY: 727236 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.000374  AC: 57AN: 152290Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.000483  AC XY: 36AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 35    Uncertain:1Benign:1 
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not specified    Benign:1 
- -
not provided    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at