chr20-62828988-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001853.4(COL9A3):​c.1008+12G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.201 in 1,593,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33,534 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 4556 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 28978 hom. )

Consequence

COL9A3
NM_001853.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.67

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL9A3 (HGNC:2219): (collagen type IX alpha 3 chain) This gene encodes one of the three alpha chains of type IX collagen, the major collagen component of hyaline cartilage. Type IX collagen, a heterotrimeric molecule, is usually found in tissues containing type II collagen, a fibrillar collagen. Mutations in this gene are associated with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
COL9A3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • epiphyseal dysplasia, multiple, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
  • Stickler syndrome, type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia due to collagen 9 anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 20-62828988-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-62828988-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258403.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.346 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001853.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL9A3
NM_001853.4
MANE Select
c.1008+12G>C
intron
N/ANP_001844.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL9A3
ENST00000649368.1
MANE Select
c.1008+12G>C
intron
N/AENSP00000496793.1
COL9A3
ENST00000463487.2
TSL:5
n.*12G>C
downstream_gene
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.231
AC:
35178
AN:
152098
Hom.:
4545
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.350
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.146
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.184
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.175
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.114
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.184
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.225
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.193
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.209
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.196
AC:
42116
AN:
214616
AF XY:
0.194
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.170
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.127
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.191
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.203
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.188
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.197
AC:
284500
AN:
1440970
Hom.:
28978
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.197
AC XY:
140865
AN XY:
715886
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.366
AC:
12101
AN:
33100
American (AMR)
AF:
0.172
AC:
7371
AN:
42830
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.167
AC:
4313
AN:
25826
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.118
AC:
4596
AN:
38792
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.189
AC:
15900
AN:
84290
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.189
AC:
9026
AN:
47808
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.216
AC:
940
AN:
4350
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.197
AC:
218078
AN:
1104484
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.205
AC:
12175
AN:
59490
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12126
24252
36378
48504
60630
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7698
15396
23094
30792
38490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.231
AC:
35224
AN:
152216
Hom.:
4556
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.228
AC XY:
16976
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.350
AC:
14544
AN:
41514
American (AMR)
AF:
0.184
AC:
2814
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.175
AC:
607
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.115
AC:
593
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.184
AC:
890
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.188
AC:
1993
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.224
AC:
66
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.193
AC:
13144
AN:
67990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.208
AC:
440
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1419
2837
4256
5674
7093
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
358
716
1074
1432
1790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.212
Hom.:
655
Bravo
AF:
0.237
Asia WGS
AF:
0.181
AC:
629
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 19, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.30
PhyloP100
-1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114458036; hg19: chr20-61460340; API