chr20-63688148-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):āc.1605G>Cā(p.Glu535Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,460,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E535E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001283009.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | NM_001283009.2 | c.1605G>C | p.Glu535Asp | missense_variant | 19/35 | ENST00000360203.11 | NP_001269938.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | ENST00000360203.11 | c.1605G>C | p.Glu535Asp | missense_variant | 19/35 | 5 | NM_001283009.2 | ENSP00000353332.5 | ||
RTEL1 | ENST00000508582.7 | c.1677G>C | p.Glu559Asp | missense_variant | 19/35 | 2 | ENSP00000424307.2 | |||
RTEL1 | ENST00000370018.7 | c.1605G>C | p.Glu535Asp | missense_variant | 19/35 | 1 | ENSP00000359035.3 | |||
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B | ENST00000492259.6 | n.1689G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 17/35 | 5 | ENSP00000457428.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1460186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726366
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at