chr20-63693165-C-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):c.2874C>A(p.Pro958Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000175 in 1,612,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P958P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RTEL1
NM_001283009.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.88

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RTEL1 (HGNC:15888): (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) This gene encodes a DNA helicase which functions in the stability, protection and elongation of telomeres and interacts with proteins in the shelterin complex known to protect telomeres during DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with dyskeratosis congenita and Hoyerall-Hreidarsson syndrome. Read-through transcription of this gene into the neighboring downstream gene, which encodes tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, generates a non-coding transcript. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

RTEL1 links:

RTEL1-TNFRSF6B (HGNC:44095): (RTEL1-TNFRSF6B readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring RTEL1 (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) and TNFRSF6B (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, decoy) genes on chromosome 20. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

RTEL1-TNFRSF6B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 20-63693165-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63693165-C-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 436573.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.88 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RTEL1	NM_001283009.2 link	c.2874C>A	p.Pro958Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 35	ENST00000360203.11	NP_001269938.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
RTEL1	ENST00000360203.11 link	c.2874C>A	p.Pro958Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 35	5	NM_001283009.2	ENSP00000353332.5
RTEL1	ENST00000508582.7 link	c.2946C>A	p.Pro982Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 35	2		ENSP00000424307.2
RTEL1	ENST00000370018.7 link	c.2874C>A	p.Pro958Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 35	1		ENSP00000359035.3
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B	ENST00000492259.6 link	n.*476C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 27 of 35	5		ENSP00000457428.1
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B	ENST00000492259.6 link	n.*476C>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 27 of 35	5		ENSP00000457428.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000725

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000923

AC:

AN:

249262

AF XY:

0.0000887

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000622

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000579

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000181

AC:

264

AN:

1459978

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000182

AC XY:

132

AN XY:

726284

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44688

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26104

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000192

AC:

AN:

52074

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000223

AC:

248

AN:

1111586

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000166

AC:

AN:

60332

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.474

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74286

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000725

AC:

AN:

41380

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5204

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000206

AC:

AN:

68000

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000115

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000140

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 13, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Mar 25, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5;C4225346:Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3

Benign:1

Jul 24, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.042

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.62

PhyloP100

-3.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over