chr21-41168429-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_012105.5(BACE2):c.166C>T(p.His56Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000187 in 1,398,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012105.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACE2 | NM_012105.5 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000330333.11 | |
BACE2 | NM_138991.3 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/8 | ||
BACE2 | NM_138992.3 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACE2 | ENST00000330333.11 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_012105.5 | P1 | |
BACE2 | ENST00000347667.5 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/8 | 1 | |||
BACE2 | ENST00000328735.10 | c.166C>T | p.His56Tyr | missense_variant | 1/8 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000310 AC: 47AN: 151724Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000419 AC: 22AN: 52534Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000391 AC XY: 12AN XY: 30718
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000172 AC: 215AN: 1247120Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 123AN XY: 611680
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000310 AC: 47AN: 151828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000350 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74196
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Aug 20, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at