chr21-44592331-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_198688.3(KRTAP10-6):c.154T>C(p.Cys52Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198688.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ectodermal dysplasia 14, hair/tooth type with or without hypohidrosisInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 98Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198688.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRTAP10-6 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.154T>C | p.Cys52Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000383219.1 | P60371 | ||
| TSPEAR | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.83-24326T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000321987.4 | Q8WU66-1 | |||
| TSPEAR | c.83-24326T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000613342.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 8
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000420 AC: 1AN: 237932 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 8
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at