chr21-46334596-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_006031.6(PCNT):ā€‹c.467A>Gā€‹(p.His156Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 139,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H156Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0062 ( 62 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

PCNT
NM_006031.6 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.595
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCNT (HGNC:16068): (pericentrin) The protein encoded by this gene binds to calmodulin and is expressed in the centrosome. It is an integral component of the pericentriolar material (PCM). The protein contains a series of coiled-coil domains and a highly conserved PCM targeting motif called the PACT domain near its C-terminus. The protein interacts with the microtubule nucleation component gamma-tubulin and is likely important to normal functioning of the centrosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell-cycle progression. Mutations in this gene cause Seckel syndrome-4 and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003022194).
BP6
Variant 21-46334596-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-46334596-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159608.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr21-46334596-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PCNTNM_006031.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.467A>G p.His156Arg missense_variant 3/47 ENST00000359568.10
PCNTNM_001315529.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.113A>G p.His38Arg missense_variant 3/47

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PCNTENST00000359568.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.467A>G p.His156Arg missense_variant 3/471 NM_006031.6 P2O95613-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
194
AN:
139612
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000905
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000427
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000696
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00156
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00138
AC:
330
AN:
238690
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00130
AC XY:
167
AN XY:
128936
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000632
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000926
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000812
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00241
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00206
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.00617
AC:
8203
AN:
1330044
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00580
AC XY:
3846
AN XY:
663618
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000445
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00762
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
195
AN:
139726
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00131
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
68688
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000905
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000428
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000696
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00154
Alfa
AF:
0.0456
Hom.:
58
Bravo
AF:
0.0376
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0467
AC:
173
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0488
AC:
188
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00726
AC:
32
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0370
AC:
318
ExAC
AF:
0.000556
AC:
67

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaMar 06, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 12, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 19, 2016- -
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.053
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.78
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.23
DANN
Benign
0.31
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.016
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.9
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.00062
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.15
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.69
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.030
N
REVEL
Benign
0.023
Sift
Benign
0.45
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.44
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.084
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.099
ClinPred
0.0013
T
GERP RS
0.16
Varity_R
0.025
gMVP
0.015

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61735825; hg19: chr21-47754510; COSMIC: COSV64028541; API