chr21-46440080-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006031.6(PCNT):​c.9274-3C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00391 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 68 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 6 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 ( 62 hom. )

Consequence

PCNT
NM_006031.6 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.01661
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.79

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCNT (HGNC:16068): (pericentrin) The protein encoded by this gene binds to calmodulin and is expressed in the centrosome. It is an integral component of the pericentriolar material (PCM). The protein contains a series of coiled-coil domains and a highly conserved PCM targeting motif called the PACT domain near its C-terminus. The protein interacts with the microtubule nucleation component gamma-tubulin and is likely important to normal functioning of the centrosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell-cycle progression. Mutations in this gene cause Seckel syndrome-4 and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
PCNT Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Moyamoya disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 21-46440080-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-46440080-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 159690.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00329 (501/152298) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0263 (127/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0226. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 253 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006031.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PCNT
NM_006031.6
MANE Select
c.9274-3C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_006022.3
PCNT
NM_001315529.2
c.8683-3C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001302458.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PCNT
ENST00000359568.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.9274-3C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000352572.5
PCNT
ENST00000480896.5
TSL:1
c.8683-3C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000511989.1
PCNT
ENST00000695537.1
n.334C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00330
AC:
502
AN:
152180
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00622
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00595
AC:
1493
AN:
251050
AF XY:
0.00753
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00387
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00619
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00397
AC:
5803
AN:
1461732
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00482
AC XY:
3502
AN XY:
727178
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000627
AC:
21
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
114
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0140
AC:
366
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0249
AC:
2147
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000150
AC:
8
AN:
53326
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0313
AC:
180
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00233
AC:
2590
AN:
1111976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00623
AC:
376
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
355
710
1065
1420
1775
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
102
204
306
408
510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00329
AC:
501
AN:
152298
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00340
AC XY:
253
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000409
AC:
17
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00372
AC:
57
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0158
AC:
55
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0263
AC:
127
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000942
AC:
1
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0340
AC:
10
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00318
AC:
216
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00616
AC:
13
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
69
92
115
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00367
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00272
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
35
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00480
EpiControl
AF:
0.00533

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 24, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
Jan 06, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 25, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Jun 15, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:2
Sep 28, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
3.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=76/24
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.19
SpliceAI score (max)
0.15
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200348425; hg19: chr21-47859993; COSMIC: COSV64030227; COSMIC: COSV64030227; API