chr22-20859103-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004782.4(SNAP29):c.-8C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,594,494 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 22 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 26 hom. )
Consequence
SNAP29
NM_004782.4 5_prime_UTR
NM_004782.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.205
Genes affected
SNAP29 (HGNC:11133): (synaptosome associated protein 29) This gene, a member of the SNAP25 gene family, encodes a protein involved in multiple membrane trafficking steps. Two other members of this gene family, SNAP23 and SNAP25, encode proteins that bind a syntaxin protein and mediate synaptic vesicle membrane docking and fusion to the plasma membrane. The protein encoded by this gene binds tightly to multiple syntaxins and is localized to intracellular membrane structures rather than to the plasma membrane. While the protein is mostly membrane-bound, a significant fraction of it is found free in the cytoplasm. Use of multiple polyadenylation sites has been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PI4KA (HGNC:8983): (phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha) This gene encodes a phosphatidylinositol (PI) 4-kinase which catalyzes the first committed step in the biosynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. The mammalian PI 4-kinases have been classified into two types, II and III, based on their molecular mass, and modulation by detergent and adenosine. The protein encoded by this gene is a type III enzyme that is not inhibited by adenosine. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2018]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 22-20859103-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-20859103-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 340827.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-20859103-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0103 (1567/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0352 (1464/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0337. There are 22 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 762 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 22 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP29 | NM_004782.4 | c.-8C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000215730.12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP29 | ENST00000215730.12 | c.-8C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/5 | 1 | NM_004782.4 | P1 | ||
PI4KA | ENST00000449120.1 | c.-19+20G>C | intron_variant | 4 | |||||
SNAP29 | ENST00000490458.1 | n.23C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0103 AC: 1562AN: 152174Hom.: 22 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1562
AN:
152174
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00236 AC: 530AN: 224710Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00173 AC XY: 214AN XY: 123438
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
530
AN:
224710
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
123438
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00105 AC: 1517AN: 1442202Hom.: 26 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000885 AC XY: 635AN XY: 717574
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1517
AN:
1442202
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
635
AN XY:
717574
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0103 AC: 1567AN: 152292Hom.: 22 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0102 AC XY: 762AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1567
AN:
152292
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
762
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 01, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 07, 2018 | - - |
CEDNIK syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at