chr22-28687932-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The ENST00000404276.6(CHEK2):āc.1597A>Gā(p.Thr533Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000445 in 1,596,430 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T533I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000404276.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1597A>G | p.Thr533Ala | missense_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1597A>G | p.Thr533Ala | missense_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000141 AC: 33AN: 233692Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 16AN XY: 128342
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000367 AC: 53AN: 1444110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000292 AC XY: 21AN XY: 718796
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 09, 2020 | Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29522266, 26260725, 28873162, 12855706, 30851065, 28580595) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 16, 2022 | The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0017 (34/19558 chromosomes in East Asian subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 29522266 (2018), 28580595 (2018), and 33471991 (2021)), colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 29703253 (2018) and 33563768 (2022)) and in healthy control individuals (PMIDs: 30287823 (2018) and 33471991 (2021)). Functional studies described this variant as being functional in an in vivo yeast-based growth rate assay (PMID: 30851065 (2019)) and reported normal CHEK2 autophosphorylation in an in vitro kinase assay (PMID: 12855706 (2003)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 11, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 07, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 24, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 01, 2022 | Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1597A>G (p.Thr533Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 233692 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5.44 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00031), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. However, pseudogene interference cannot be ruled out. The variant, c.1597A>G, has been reported in the literature in one individual with a melanoma arising in a congenital nevus of Ito, however germline or somatic status was not clearly established (Tse_2016). Additionally, the variant was reported in a patient with breast cancer (Xie_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. One publication reports experimental evidence showing kinase activity comparable to wild-type associated with this variant (Wu_2003) while another reports growth in yeast as comprable to positive control (Delimitsou_2019). Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (four classified as VUS while four classified as likely benign). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS - possibly benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne | Jan 09, 2024 | . According to the ACMG standard criteria we chose these criteria: BP4 (supporting benign): REVEL: 0.073, BS1 (strong benign): popmax:EAS popmax AF:0.00345888, BS3 (strong benign): Delimitsou (2019): benign in yeast, Stolarova (2023): benign in both assays in human cells - |
CHEK2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 05, 2024 | The CHEK2 c.1597A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Thr533Ala. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (Table S2, Hauke et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29522266; described as p.Thr576Ala in Table S3, Xie et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 28580595) and an individual with advanced cancer (eTable, Mandelker et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28873162). It has been reported along with variants in other genes as a possible somatic variant in a melanoma specimen (Table 2, Tse et al. 2016. PubMed ID 26260725) and a colorectal cancer specimen (Table S2, Mei et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29703253). Assessment using an in vivo, yeast based, functional assay suggests this variant is benign (Table 1, Delimitsou et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30851065). This variant has been reported at a frequency of 0.17% in individuals of East Asian origin in gnomAD. However, this variant falls within a highly paralogous region and allele frequency data should be interpreted with caution. It has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from uncertain significance to benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/142032/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at