chr22-30612911-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_000355.4(TCN2):āc.296A>Cā(p.Lys99Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000237 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K99K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000355.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCN2 | NM_000355.4 | c.296A>C | p.Lys99Thr | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000215838.8 | |
TCN2 | NM_001184726.2 | c.296A>C | p.Lys99Thr | missense_variant | 3/9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCN2 | ENST00000215838.8 | c.296A>C | p.Lys99Thr | missense_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_000355.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00121 AC: 184AN: 152186Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000274 AC: 69AN: 251372Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000206 AC XY: 28AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000134 AC: 196AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000120 AC XY: 87AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152304Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 89AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Transcobalamin II deficiency Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 10, 2023 | The TCN2 c.296A>C; p.Lys99Thr variant (rs150225103), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 529780). This variant is found in the African/African-American population with an allele frequency of 0.38% (96/24,958 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.209). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 13, 2019 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at