chr22-36288285-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.4899G>A​(p.Arg1633=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0538 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,962 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.072 ( 469 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.052 ( 2493 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.725
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 22-36288285-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36288285-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44566.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36288285-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.725 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.117 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.4899G>A p.Arg1633= synonymous_variant 34/41 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.4899G>A p.Arg1633= synonymous_variant 34/411 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181 P1P35579-1
MYH9ENST00000685801.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4962G>A p.Arg1654= synonymous_variant 35/42 ENSP00000510688
MYH9ENST00000691109.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.5194G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 28/35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0724
AC:
11013
AN:
152102
Hom.:
468
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.120
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0866
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0914
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0598
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0791
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0665
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0714
AC:
17958
AN:
251380
Hom.:
834
AF XY:
0.0680
AC XY:
9236
AN XY:
135870
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0986
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0786
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0652
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0435
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0627
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0519
AC:
75800
AN:
1461798
Hom.:
2493
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0523
AC XY:
38017
AN XY:
727204
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.127
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0445
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0940
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0760
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0675
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0426
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0536
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0724
AC:
11017
AN:
152220
Hom.:
469
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0720
AC XY:
5359
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0863
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0910
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0718
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0598
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0658
Alfa
AF:
0.0513
Hom.:
321
Bravo
AF:
0.0774
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0690
AC:
238
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0416
EpiControl
AF:
0.0402

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Arg1633Arg in Exon 34 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 11.1% (414/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs5756130). -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
4.7
DANN
Benign
0.53
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5756130; hg19: chr22-36684331; COSMIC: COSV53392170; COSMIC: COSV53392170; API