chr22-37226775-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_002872.5(RAC2):c.477T>A(p.Ala159Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,460,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A159A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002872.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- immunodeficiency 73b with defective neutrophil chemotaxis and lymphopeniaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- immunodeficiency 73c with defective neutrophil chemotaxis and hypogammaglobulinemiaInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- neutrophil immunodeficiency syndromeInheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAC2 | NM_002872.5 | c.477T>A | p.Ala159Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | ENST00000249071.11 | NP_002863.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250422 AF XY: 0.00000738 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726746 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at