chr22-37735002-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001039141.3(TRIOBP):​c.4666G>A​(p.Glu1556Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000093 in 1,613,176 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000064 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TRIOBP
NM_001039141.3 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.28

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TRIOBP (HGNC:17009): (TRIO and F-actin binding protein) This gene encodes a protein with an N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain and a C-terminal coiled-coil region. The protein interacts with trio, which is involved with neural tissue development and controlling actin cytoskeleton organization, cell motility and cell growth. The protein also associates with F-actin and stabilizes F-actin structures. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that would encode different isoforms have been found for this gene, however some transcripts may be subject to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
TRIOBP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 28
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022806317).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000374 (57/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00128 (53/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.001. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 26 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TRIOBPNM_001039141.3 linkc.4666G>A p.Glu1556Lys missense_variant Exon 9 of 24 ENST00000644935.1 NP_001034230.1 Q9H2D6-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TRIOBPENST00000644935.1 linkc.4666G>A p.Glu1556Lys missense_variant Exon 9 of 24 NM_001039141.3 ENSP00000496394.1 Q9H2D6-1
TRIOBPENST00000344404.10 linkn.*4149G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 7 of 22 2 ENSP00000340312.6 H7BXW4
TRIOBPENST00000344404.10 linkn.*4149G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 22 2 ENSP00000340312.6 H7BXW4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000375
AC:
57
AN:
152188
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
26
AN:
248376
AF XY:
0.0000889
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000584
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000356
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000637
AC:
93
AN:
1460870
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.0000509
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
726662
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000628
AC:
21
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000403
AC:
18
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52764
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
49
AN:
1111736
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000663
AC:
4
AN:
60358
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
13
19
26
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152306
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000349
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
53
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15314
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.515
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
7
10
14
17
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000683
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000404
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000990
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000827
AC:
10

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The TRIOBP p.Glu1556Lys variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs376793698) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Laboratory for Molecular Medicine). The variant was identified in control databases in 39 of 279712 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001394 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 20 of 24118 chromosomes (freq: 0.000829), Latino in 14 of 35332 chromosomes (freq: 0.000396) and European (non-Finnish) in 5 of 127786 chromosomes (freq: 0.000039), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Other, or South Asian populations. The p.Glu1556 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Dec 11, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Reported as a single variant in an individual with hearing loss in published literature who also harbored variants in other genes (PMID: 29907799); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29907799) -

Feb 18, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1556 of the TRIOBP protein (p.Glu1556Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs376793698, gnomAD 0.09%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TRIOBP-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 178556). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jul 22, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Glu1556Lys vari ant in TRIOBP has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss, but has been identified in 0.1% (4/4042) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). Although th e variant has been identified in the general population, its frequency is not hi gh enough to rule out pathogenicity. The glutamic acid (Glu) at position 1556 is not conserved in mammals or evolutionary distant species, raising the possibili ty that a change at this position may be tolerated. Additional computational pre diction tools suggest that the Glu1556Lys variant may not impact the protein, th ough this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In sum mary, while the clinical significance of the Glu1556Lys variant it is uncertain, collectively these data suggests that it is more likely to be benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.031
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.40
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.44
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.20
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.016
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.023
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;L
PhyloP100
5.3
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.58
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.061
Sift
Uncertain
0.0040
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;.
Polyphen
0.84
P;P
Vest4
0.20
MVP
0.35
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.048
T
GERP RS
3.6
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.096
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376793698; hg19: chr22-38131009; COSMIC: COSV60376884; API