chr22-39313212-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_000967.4(RPL3):c.1146G>A(p.Met382Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000497 in 1,609,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M382V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000967.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000967.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPL3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1146G>A | p.Met382Ile | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000346001.3 | P39023 | ||
| RPL3 | TSL:1 | c.990G>A | p.Met330Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000386101.1 | G5E9G0 | ||
| RPL3 | TSL:1 | n.1986G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 9 of 10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000832 AC: 2AN: 240342 AF XY: 0.0000154 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000480 AC: 7AN: 1456870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000690 AC XY: 5AN XY: 724258 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at