chr22-50220869-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_020461.4(TUBGCP6):c.3490G>A(p.Val1164Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000313 in 1,611,396 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1164A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TUBGCP6
NM_020461.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.610

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TUBGCP6 (HGNC:18127): (tubulin gamma complex component 6) The protein encoded by this gene is part of a large multisubunit complex required for microtubule nucleation at the centrosome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TUBGCP6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly and chorioretinopathy 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen

TUBGCP6 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007892489).

BP6

Variant 22-50220869-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-50220869-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 437147.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00143 (216/150576) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00509 (208/40864). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00452. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 98 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TUBGCP6	NM_020461.4 link	c.3490G>A	p.Val1164Met	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 25	ENST00000248846.10	NP_065194.3	Q96RT7-1
TUBGCP6	XR_001755343.3 link	n.4054G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 16 of 20
TUBGCP6	XR_938347.3 link	n.4054G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 16 of 23
TUBGCP6	XR_007067982.1 link	n.3049-854G>A		intron_variant	Intron 15 of 18

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TUBGCP6	ENST00000248846.10 link	c.3490G>A	p.Val1164Met	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 25	1	NM_020461.4	ENSP00000248846.5	Q96RT7-1
TUBGCP6	ENST00000439308.7 link	n.3490G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 16 of 25	1		ENSP00000397387.2	E7EQL8
TUBGCP6	ENST00000498611.5 link	n.3617+406G>A		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 22	1
TUBGCP6	ENST00000491449.5 link	n.1797G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 8 of 16	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00143

AC:

215

AN:

150450

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00508

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000198

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000739

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000314

AC:

AN:

251420

AF XY:

0.000258

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00431

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000197

AC:

288

AN:

1460820

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000180

AC XY:

131

AN XY:

726716

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00634

AC:

212

AN:

33420

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000898

AC:

AN:

44560

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26088

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39638

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86162

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53240

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000360

AC:

AN:

1111594

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000514

AC:

AN:

60356

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.462

Heterozygous variant carriers

120

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00143

AC:

216

AN:

150576

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00133

AC XY:

AN XY:

73594

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00509

AC:

208

AN:

40864

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000198

AC:

AN:

15164

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3460

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5054

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4726

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10430

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

268

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000739

AC:

AN:

67616

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.457

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000645

Hom.:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00386

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000420

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Feb 24, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

TUBGCP6-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 21, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.30

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.52

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.025

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.046

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.16

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.27

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.024

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0079

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.3

M;.

PhyloP100

0.61

PrimateAI

Benign

0.38

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.3

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.053

Sift

Benign

0.056

T;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.043

D;T

Polyphen

0.82

P;.

Vest4

0.42

MVP

0.31

MPC

0.11

ClinPred

0.032

GERP RS

4.6

PromoterAI

-0.033

Neutral

(source)

Varity_R

0.038

gMVP

0.29

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over