chr3-126988697-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_032242.4(PLXNA1):​c.104G>A​(p.Gly35Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000703 in 1,422,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G35R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 7.0e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PLXNA1
NM_032242.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance no assertion criteria provided U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.47

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PLXNA1 (HGNC:9099): (plexin A1) Predicted to enable semaphorin receptor activity. Predicted to be involved in several processes, including generation of neurons; regulation of GTPase activity; and regulation of cell shape. Predicted to act upstream of or within dichotomous subdivision of terminal units involved in salivary gland branching; neuron projection morphogenesis; and regulation of smooth muscle cell migration. Located in cytosol and nucleoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
PLXNA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Dworschak-Punetha neurodevelopmental syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.102990955).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PLXNA1NM_032242.4 linkc.104G>A p.Gly35Glu missense_variant Exon 2 of 32 ENST00000393409.3 NP_115618.3 Q9UIW2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PLXNA1ENST00000393409.3 linkc.104G>A p.Gly35Glu missense_variant Exon 2 of 32 1 NM_032242.4 ENSP00000377061.2 Q9UIW2
PLXNA1ENST00000684469.1 linkc.104G>A p.Gly35Glu missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENSP00000507976.1 A0A804HKL4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
34
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
7.03e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1422358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00000142
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
702054
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32938
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
42334
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
23492
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39324
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
78878
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
50658
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5594
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
9.17e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1090454
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
58686
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
34

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

PLXNA1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Dec 26, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PLXNA1 c.104G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gly35Glu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature or in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.36
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.88
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.81
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.66
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.52
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0053
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L
PhyloP100
1.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N
REVEL
Benign
0.067
Sift
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.46
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.15
MutPred
0.28
Gain of loop (P = 0.1069);
MVP
0.15
MPC
0.56
ClinPred
0.069
T
GERP RS
1.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.56
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

hg19: chr3-126707540; API