chr3-129488313-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_052989.3(IFT122):​c.1908T>C​(p.Ile636Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000559 in 1,614,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

IFT122
NM_052989.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.185

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
IFT122 (HGNC:13556): (intraflagellar transport 122) This gene encodes a member of the WD repeat protein family. WD repeats are minimally conserved regions of approximately 40 amino acids typically bracketed by gly-his and trp-asp (GH-WD), which may facilitate formation of heterotrimeric or multiprotein complexes. Members of this family are involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, and gene regulation. This cytoplasmic protein contains seven WD repeats and an AF-2 domain which function by recruiting coregulatory molecules and in transcriptional activation. Mutations in this gene cause cranioectodermal dysplasia-1. A related pseudogene is located on chromosome 3. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
IFT122 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cranioectodermal dysplasia 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • cranioectodermal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 3-129488313-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-129488313-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 211179.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.185 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00315 (480/152346) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0113 (471/41582). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0105. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 225 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
IFT122NM_052989.3 linkc.1908T>C p.Ile636Ile synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 30 ENST00000348417.7 NP_443715.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
IFT122ENST00000348417.7 linkc.1908T>C p.Ile636Ile synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 30 1 NM_052989.3 ENSP00000324005.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00315
AC:
479
AN:
152228
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000847
AC:
213
AN:
251490
AF XY:
0.000625
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000289
AC:
423
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000263
AC XY:
191
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0111
AC:
372
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000313
AC:
14
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
8.99e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1111976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000596
AC:
36
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
27
54
80
107
134
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00315
AC:
480
AN:
152346
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00302
AC XY:
225
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0113
AC:
471
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000392
AC:
6
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00139
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00338
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cranioectodermal dysplasia 1 Benign:3
Dec 16, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 27, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Apr 30, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

IFT122-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 19, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1
Apr 18, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.71
PhyloP100
-0.18
PromoterAI
0.032
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139722192; hg19: chr3-129207156; API