Variant chr3-142558733-A-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001184.4(ATR):c.1776T>A(p.Gly592Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.577 in 1,609,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 272,130 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.63 ( 30789 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.57 ( 241341 hom. )

Consequence

ATR
NM_001184.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.264

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATR (HGNC:882): (ATR serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase and DNA damage sensor, activating cell cycle checkpoint signaling upon DNA stress. The encoded protein can phosphorylate and activate several proteins involved in the inhibition of DNA replication and mitosis, and can promote DNA repair, recombination, and apoptosis. This protein is also important for fragile site stability and centrosome duplication. Defects in this gene are a cause of Seckel syndrome 1. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

ATR links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).

BP6

Variant 3-142558733-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-142558733-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 157965.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-142558733-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.264 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.787 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATR	NM_001184.4 link	c.1776T>A	p.Gly592Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 47	ENST00000350721.9	NP_001175.2	Q13535-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATR	ENST00000350721.9 link	c.1776T>A	p.Gly592Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 47	1	NM_001184.4	ENSP00000343741.4		Q13535-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.626

AC:

95066

AN:

151788

Hom.:

30738

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.794

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.679

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.534

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.561

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.465

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.444

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.539

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.614

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.587

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.621

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.546

AC:

136880

AN:

250500

Hom.:

38556

AF XY:

0.542

AC XY:

73359

AN XY:

135456

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.800

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.453

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.564

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.469

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.432

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.551

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.579

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.555

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.572

AC:

833137

AN:

1457486

Hom.:

241341

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.567

AC XY:

411520

AN XY:

725186

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.805

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.463

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.561

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.444

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.433

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.548

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.586

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.574

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.626

AC:

95163

AN:

151904

Hom.:

30789

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.618

AC XY:

45910

AN XY:

74236

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.794

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.533

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.561

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.465

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.443

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.539

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.587

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.625

Alfa

AF:

0.597

Hom.:

8897

Bravo

AF:

0.634

Asia WGS

AF:

0.505

AC:

1755

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Dec 20, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Apr 27, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1776T>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 in silico tools via Alamut predict the variant to eliminate a cryptic splice donor site, thereby potential resulting in a protective effect on normal splicing. The variant was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 55% which includes 19,239 homozygous occurrences. Therefore this synonymous variant is the major allele and has been classified as Benign. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Seckel syndrome 1

Benign:2

Jul 14, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Familial cutaneous telangiectasia and oropharyngeal predisposition cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

5.6

DANN

Benign

0.67

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over