chr3-148697873-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The ENST00000497524.5(AGTR1):c.-302T>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 152,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

AGTR1
ENST00000497524.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.56

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

AGTR1 (HGNC:336): (angiotensin II receptor type 1) Angiotensin II is a potent vasopressor hormone and a primary regulator of aldosterone secretion. It is an important effector controlling blood pressure and volume in the cardiovascular system. It acts through at least two types of receptors. This gene encodes the type 1 receptor which is thought to mediate the major cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II. This gene may play a role in the generation of reperfusion arrhythmias following restoration of blood flow to ischemic or infarcted myocardium. It was previously thought that a related gene, denoted as AGTR1B, existed; however, it is now believed that there is only one type 1 receptor gene in humans. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

AGTR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic origin
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
essential hypertension, genetic
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

AGTR1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000131 (20/152204) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00394 (19/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 11 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000497524.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
AGTR1	NM_000685.5	MANE Select	c.-386T>G	upstream_gene	N/A	NP_000676.1	P30556
AGTR1	NM_001382736.1		c.-324T>G	upstream_gene	N/A	NP_001369665.1	Q53YY0
AGTR1	NM_001382737.1		c.-408T>G	upstream_gene	N/A	NP_001369666.1	P30556

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
AGTR1	ENST00000497524.5	TSL:1	c.-302T>G	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 2	ENSP00000419422.1	P30556
AGTR1	ENST00000418473.7	TSL:5	c.-360T>G	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 3	ENSP00000398832.4	P30556
AGTR1	ENST00000892854.1		c.-444T>G	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 4	ENSP00000562913.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152086

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

158

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

American (AMR)

AC:

AN:

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

170

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41536

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5152

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00394

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67992

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000122

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, single submitter

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Renal tubular dysgenesis (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.38

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

1.6

PromoterAI

-0.11

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=299/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over