chr3-189866774-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_003722.5(TP63):c.859C>T(p.Leu287Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0197 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 370 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.020 ( 347 hom. )
Consequence
TP63
NM_003722.5 synonymous
NM_003722.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.983
Genes affected
TP63 (HGNC:15979): (tumor protein p63) This gene encodes a member of the p53 family of transcription factors. The functional domains of p53 family proteins include an N-terminal transactivation domain, a central DNA-binding domain and an oligomerization domain. Alternative splicing of this gene and the use of alternative promoters results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms that vary in their functional properties. These isoforms function during skin development and maintenance, adult stem/progenitor cell regulation, heart development and premature aging. Some isoforms have been found to protect the germline by eliminating oocytes or testicular germ cells that have suffered DNA damage. Mutations in this gene are associated with ectodermal dysplasia, and cleft lip/palate syndrome 3 (EEC3); split-hand/foot malformation 4 (SHFM4); ankyloblepharon-ectodermal defects-cleft lip/palate; ADULT syndrome (acro-dermato-ungual-lacrimal-tooth); limb-mammary syndrome; Rap-Hodgkin syndrome (RHS); and orofacial cleft 8. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 3-189866774-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-189866774-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259134.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-189866774-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.983 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0143 (2179/152222) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0276 (133/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0238. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1036 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 2179 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP63 | NM_003722.5 | c.859C>T | p.Leu287Leu | synonymous_variant | 6/14 | ENST00000264731.8 | NP_003713.3 | |
TP63 | NM_001114980.2 | c.577C>T | p.Leu193Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/12 | ENST00000354600.10 | NP_001108452.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP63 | ENST00000264731.8 | c.859C>T | p.Leu287Leu | synonymous_variant | 6/14 | 1 | NM_003722.5 | ENSP00000264731.3 | ||
TP63 | ENST00000354600.10 | c.577C>T | p.Leu193Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/12 | 1 | NM_001114980.2 | ENSP00000346614.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0143 AC: 2181AN: 152104Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2181
AN:
152104
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0163 AC: 4093AN: 251342Hom.: 46 AF XY: 0.0173 AC XY: 2348AN XY: 135824
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4093
AN:
251342
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2348
AN XY:
135824
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0202 AC: 29556AN: 1461756Hom.: 347 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0205 AC XY: 14924AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
29556
AN:
1461756
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
14924
AN XY:
727170
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0143 AC: 2179AN: 152222Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0139 AC XY: 1036AN XY: 74418
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2179
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1036
AN XY:
74418
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
64
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
TP63-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Orofacial cleft 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, and cleft lip-palate syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at