chr3-190388453-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006580.4(CLDN16):​c.114+10T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.218 in 1,612,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41,175 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 3085 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.22 ( 38090 hom. )

Consequence

CLDN16
NM_006580.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.164

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLDN16 (HGNC:2037): (claudin 16) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. It is found primarily in the kidneys, specifically in the thick ascending limb of Henle, where it acts as either an intercellular pore or ion concentration sensor to regulate the paracellular resorption of magnesium ions. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary hypomagnesemia, which is characterized by massive renal magnesium wasting with hypomagnesemia and hypercalciuria, resulting in nephrocalcinosis and renal failure. This gene and the CLDN1 gene are clustered on chromosome 3q28. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
CLDN16 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • renal hypomagnesemia 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 3-190388453-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-190388453-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260004.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.241 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CLDN16NM_006580.4 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 4 ENST00000264734.3 NP_006571.2
CLDN16NM_001378492.1 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 NP_001365421.1
CLDN16NM_001378493.1 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 7 NP_001365422.1
CLDN16XM_047447333.1 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 3 of 6 XP_047303289.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CLDN16ENST00000264734.3 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 4 1 NM_006580.4 ENSP00000264734.3
CLDN16ENST00000456423.2 linkc.114+10T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 1 ENSP00000414136.2
ENSG00000297357ENST00000747317.1 linkn.98A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 2
CLDN16ENST00000468220.1 linkn.306+13850T>C intron_variant Intron 3 of 4 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.186
AC:
28348
AN:
152020
Hom.:
3086
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0907
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.186
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.174
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.269
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.167
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.259
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.293
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.244
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.212
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.193
AC:
48331
AN:
250268
AF XY:
0.200
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0857
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.277
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.255
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.248
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.222
AC:
323722
AN:
1459950
Hom.:
38090
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.222
AC XY:
160991
AN XY:
726402
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0866
AC:
2898
AN:
33446
American (AMR)
AF:
0.113
AC:
5067
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.273
AC:
7140
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0291
AC:
1155
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.172
AC:
14805
AN:
86230
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.253
AC:
13491
AN:
53392
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.270
AC:
1558
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.238
AC:
264603
AN:
1110250
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.216
AC:
13005
AN:
60324
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12053
24106
36159
48212
60265
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8746
17492
26238
34984
43730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.186
AC:
28360
AN:
152138
Hom.:
3085
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.186
AC XY:
13860
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0908
AC:
3772
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.174
AC:
2663
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.269
AC:
935
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0265
AC:
137
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.168
AC:
809
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.259
AC:
2740
AN:
10584
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.291
AC:
85
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.244
AC:
16613
AN:
67962
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.208
AC:
437
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1138
2277
3415
4554
5692
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
298
596
894
1192
1490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.209
Hom.:
1186
Bravo
AF:
0.172
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0890
AC:
313
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.324+10T>C in intron 1 of CLDN16: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 25.12% (16730/66596) of European chromosomes by the Exom e Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1491994) .

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Nov 11, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Primary hypomagnesemia Benign:2
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-0.16
PromoterAI
0.021
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1491994; hg19: chr3-190106242; API