chr3-32159640-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_015141.4(GPD1L):āc.925T>Cā(p.Tyr309His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000411 in 1,459,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015141.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPD1L | NM_015141.4 | c.925T>C | p.Tyr309His | missense_variant | 7/8 | ENST00000282541.10 | |
GPD1L | XM_006713068.3 | c.784T>C | p.Tyr262His | missense_variant | 6/7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPD1L | ENST00000282541.10 | c.925T>C | p.Tyr309His | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | NM_015141.4 | P1 | |
GPD1L | ENST00000474846.5 | n.849T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 2 | ||||
GPD1L | ENST00000496151.1 | n.426T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 2 | ||||
GPD1L | ENST00000428684.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 251016Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135810
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1459926Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726446
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at